The Broken American Dream

For many, the American Dream has become a nightmare.
— Bernie Sanders
The American Dream is really money.
— Jill Robinson

The American Dream is a fabled, distant achievement for Asian Americans. Achieving it constitutes socioeconomic success in society, but it is not possible for Asian American immigrants to achieve. There is underlying racism and xenophobic nature rooted deep in the culture of the United States, as class and background shapes access to the American Dream. This idea of the American Dream has been perpetuated by false hope and is misleading to immigrants seeking a better life. This theme is heavily weighted in the Spa Night ¹ as the film as exemplifies the difference between first and second generation status and how the representation of American nationalism is a high priority. It is portrayed through the lives of main character David and his immigrant parents–they are in pursuit of the American Dream, as seen by David’s parents’ urge to be financially successful, send their son to a good college, and find pride in their new life. However, they struggle to support themselves economically while struggling to fit in socially with their successful peers. Ultimately, they fail to succeed.

© Getty Images, 2017.

A Theoretical Framework

The Political Sphere

The chase and fail of the American dream derives from present-day racism, xenophobia, and the anti-immigrant and anti-Asian history of the United States. The spread of this sentiment today has created a hostile environment, especially during the Trump presidency. With someone as conservative Donald Trump who embodies these racist sentiments, he took it upon himself to publicly spread anti-Asian and anti-immigrant rhetoric while president². During the Coronavirus outbreak, he stimulated Asian hate to defend his nationalistic ideas. Le states that with this and the past anti-immigrant policies he has endorsed like “build the wall”, it crushes the chances of Asian American immigrants achieving the American dream³. The non-white marginalization is detrimental, and this idea of socioeconomic success became even more distant that it was before for Asian American immigrants.

In “Sanctuary”, Paik also comments on the political climate influenced by Donald Trump, but she connects it to the U.S. Sanctuary Movement⁴. She does so in order to shape the harsh reality of immigrants moving to the United States. The U.S. Sanctuary Movement constitutes a crusade in which the U.S. should provide refuge to people fleeing their home countries due to political or social hostility. However, this is extremely ironic—immigrants are fleeing hostility just to find hostility in another form in America⁵. The U.S. consists of xenophobia, internalized and externalized racism, and a clear socioeconomic ladder based on race and wealth. It is impossible for many immigrants to achieve upward mobility as they lack the financial and social resources to thrive in the United States, while surrounded by a poor political climate influenced by the Trump presidency. The widespread influences from a racist president–one who condemned immigration through his “build the wall” campaign and deemed the Coronavirus a “Chinese virus”–created a racially hostile environment with the reinforcement of white supremacy⁶. Immigrants typically come to the U.S. with limited money and resources, which adds another disadvantage to them in the socioeconomic sphere. Minorities like Asian American immigrants automatically lay dormant beneath white Americans on the social ladder, making it more difficult for them to achieve upward social mobility in pursuit of the American dream. 

The Model Minority

The negative response of white natives to Asian immigrants may also stem from a place of insecurity. According to Kim, white people who feel threatened by the presence of Asian Americans immigrants deliberately degrade the status of them in pursuit of supremacy⁷. This stems from the fear that immigrants will “steal” jobs from native-born Americans and climb the socioeconomic ladder into being as successful as many upper class white citizens. Asian Americans have received the name “model minority” from stereotypical Asian qualities: intelligence, a hard-working mentality, and a desire for success. This title, however, is backhanded as white Americans who do so pawn Asian Americans for their own gain⁸. This title is not a compliment nor an invite for upward social status, but rather is an attempt to degrade non-white races. Although some white people claim that Asian Americans receive this title for their stereotypically respectable qualities, this is extremely presumptuous. The title clearly states that Asians are a minority in an inferior manner.

First vs. Second Generation Immigrants

Additionally, the disparity between first and second generation immigrants contributes to why Asian American immigrants cannot achieve the American dream. Cohen-Marks analyzed the political aspect of United States culture in order to cultivate a better understanding of why achieving this cannot happen. During his terms, President Bill Clinton advertised the American dream to people desiring to immigrate to the United States. He claimed that if one “works hard and plays by the rules,” they can achieve socioeconomic success. This inspired high hopes but led to crushing disappointments⁹. Asian Americans wanting to migrate to the United States have been lured by the fact that American-born Asians are successful, thus believing they will be able to mimic this success¹⁰. However, nativity plays a vital role in this: those born and raised in America who live by American ideals are able to maneuver their way through this chaos. They typically have the social and financial resources to do so, as they have grown up in the U.S. and learned how to succeed in such an environment. Plus, first generation immigrants typically immigrate due to a financial burden; second generation immigrants typically do not have these problems. Foreign-born immigrants also have not grown accustomed to American culture, so even if they “work hard” they cannot necessarily “play by the rules” because of their ignorance and vulnerability.

Wealth and Job Disparity

The oppression in the United States is not limited to the unwritten socioeconomic hierarchy–oppression and racism have manifested themselves into verbal and physical violence. Wang defines the linguistic racism of white Americans against Asians as symbolic violence, describing the implications it has on the Asian-American population¹¹. Wang achieved her conclusion through the experience of an international student from China: symbolic violence, portrayed through verbal and nonverbal language, produces arbitrary power, control, and domination for whites¹². This is a form of racial oppression which contributes to the ongoing, deeply-rooted white nationalistic thoughts that circulate throughout society. These ideas cultivate an extremely exclusive and white-supremacist-like culture that holds any minority back from climbing up the socioeconomic ladder. Thus, having the financial success that alludes to the middle and upper middle class corresponds with race¹³. Ultimately, this makes the American dream nearly unattainable for Asian American immigrants. 

Wyatt-Nichol also proposes that the American dream is a myth for immigrants. There has been declining mobility due to racism, increasing income inequality and publicized anti-Asian rhetoric¹⁴. With a recently declining economy, there have been more job losses along with lower wages. As a result, there are less people that are able to obtain a job, creating observed competition among the races¹⁵. In relation to the American dream, less job opportunities correlates with a more difficult path to achieving financial success. Because anti-Asian sentiments exist in the United States, this marginalization mythicizes the American dream. White owners who embody this mindset will choose to hire employees of their own race over Asians and other people of color; statistically, the most successful business owners are white¹⁶. Less opportunities for an ample occupation prevents Asian American from improving their socioeconomic status. Patraporn’s argument corresponds with this as well. There is a wealth inequality among minorities and whites, which illustrates how wealth within American society is majorly based on foreign-born status and ethnicity¹⁷. Patraporn conducted a study that validated the relationship between the number of years one has in the U.S. and their English language proficiency with their economic gain. He concluded that the Asian-white wealth gap is due to differences in ethnicity, immigration history, and their historical experiences. This has been impacted by immigration policies and has “manifested into ethnic differences in wealth”¹⁸. 

The wealth disparity between Asian American immigrants and native-born Americans is also grounded  in the ideas of the Price of Nice Nails.¹⁹ Nir exposes the cruel treatment of Asian immigrant workers in the nail salon industry. Nail salon owners take advantage of their ignorant employees by exploiting them in such manners that they are often left unpaid, overworked, and humiliated²⁰. They use their ascendancy and the ignorance of their workers to profit by withholding wages and forcing their employees to work an illegal amount of hours. Their ignorance derives from the fact that they have immigrated from a different country with a different cultural and social life, so they are not accustomed to their environment in the United States. Additionally, the employers have the financial and social resources to thrive in the United States, whereas the poor immigrant workers do not. Additionally, some of these workers are also verbally abused at work by the affluent, privileged, and typically white women who are customers²¹. Unfortunately, the employers do nothing to stop it–they simply want to attract affluent customers for their money and loyalty. Many of these women have a racially motivated superiority complex and are living by high-class standards, thus acting as if women of color (especially ones who are evidently immigrants) are extremely inferior to them. The burden of receiving a job with such heinous treatment is another barrier to achieving the American dream. With inadequate pay and mounds of racially-motivated disrespect from employers and customers, it inhibits socioeconomic success for Asian American immigrants.

Key Words Recap

  • Asian Americans are considered a model minority in which they are the most successful out of all minorities in the U.S., based on their stereotypical qualities: intelligence, ambition, and having a hard-working mentality.

  • The prejudice against people from different countries, as many native Americans have xenophobia towards Asian American immigrants.

  • First generation immigrants are ones whose parents were born outside the U.S. Second generation immigrants are ones whose parents were born in the U.S. In the context of the American dream, there is a wealth disparity between first and second generation immigrants due to wealth and perceived class.

© ABC News 2019.

Representation in the Media

The experience of Asian American immigrants in pursuit of the American dream also has incorporated itself into other artistic forms. As such, a political cartoon by Jie coherently represents the struggles of immigration²². The two girls in the foreground of the image are bubbling with excitement, as they seem successful and prosperous—hence the girls holding money in their hands. They are surrounded by Lady Liberty, the emulation of American freedom for all people. This represents the expectation of the American dream to most Asian immigrants and what has enticed them to migrate: money, a good job, and an adequate lifestyle. On the other hand, the man and woman in the background juxtapose this to represent the reality of the American dream. Their distance from the girls in the front represents how far they are from truly achieving the American dream, and that they may never achieve it because of their race. Their expectation of the dream is so high because that is what America makes it to be–a welcoming and inclusive “melting pot”–when actually society is not nearly as progressive as one thought.

Another significant media piece has been from the film Minari (2021), as it explores how immigrants come to pursue the American dream in pursuit of a better life for themselves and their families²⁴. It is about an Asian immigrant family moving to the United States to pursue the American dream. The father of the family, Jacob, tells his mother that the American values do not align with their own Korean values. The principles of the American dream emphasize wealth, individual successes, and social mobility. She claims it does not align with the importance of family and having meaningful relationships, but Jacob believes this is the only way to success.

A political cartoon signifying the expectations versus the reality of the American Dream for Asian American Immigrants.²³

A trailer for the film Minari which illustrates how immigration takes a toll on traditional family life. ²⁵

As an anecdotal piece, the film Linsanity (2013) also contributes to this theme by telling the story of Jeremy Lin: an Asian American NBA player who grew up surrounded by racism and discrimination. He had been told by many people he would not be able to play professional basketball, as his race is a “barrier” to his success²⁶. He claims that “growing up Asian American, you always have a chip on your shoulder” and that “you always have to prove yourself”. In his interview, he mentions that his nickname “Linsanity” was a microaggression as if people were saying to him “he’s excellent at basketball…for an Asian man.” He believes that he received this fame because stereotypically, Asians have been deemed slower, weaker, and less athletic than white or black players. They do not have the physical build or height as other races to excel in the NBA, so he felt like the NBA’s golden Asian player. 

A trailer for the film Linsanity that reveals how star Jeremy Lin feels setback from success due to his race.²⁷

Another contribution is the court case, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, represented by a protest sign²⁸. The court case exemplifies the educational disparity between Asian Americans and white Americans. This is important because educational success highly correlates with socioeconomic success. In the case, the Harvard undergraduate admissions committee was believed to have discriminated against Asian American students, where they aimed to limit the amount of them admitted to the university. The sign reads ‘Harvard no more racial stereotyping’²⁹. The racial stereotyping is in reference to how admissions members view Asian American applicants: negative personality, unlikable, unkind, and not widely respected. This is derived from the investigation by the plaintiff, who claimed that although Asian Americans score higher academically than other races, they were rated lower by admissions officers and alumni in terms of personality traits. The plaintiff believes that this is discriminatory and is a racial generalization.

This protest sign thus indicates that it is extremely difficult for Asian Americans to achieve upward mobility, as upward mobility is associated with socioeconomic status and success. Harvard is the epitome of socioeconomic status–it is an extremely selective school who provides a stellar education to the most gifted, prestigious students. Excluding Asian American students, especially during a time where affirmative action is enforced, shows that the horde of caucasian Harvard administrators do not want Asian Americans to succeed like the white students. This contributes to why Asian American immigrants cannot achieve the American dream–their white counterparts simply do not want them to.

A protest sign during a lawsuit against Harvard admissions for racially discriminating against Asian applicants.³⁰

In another political cartoon, President Trump is face-to-face with an Asian American citizen³¹. This cartoon illustrates the anti-Asian hate over the COVID-19 pandemic, which stemmed from Trump’s public, discriminatory rhetoric. Looking at the illustration, he is condescending towards the Asian man wearing a red USA hat. He believes Asians are to blame for the pandemic, which, in turn, has influenced the mindset of many Americans. As a result, any progressivity towards stopping Asian hate has completely dissipated, and an anti-Asian climate has stemmed.

A political cartoon showing Trump’s anti-Asian sentiment.³²

Altogether, these five media objects are presented in a chronological order to show how they intertwine. They are displayed as a journey through time, where each media object represents a significant moment in history. Asian American discrimination has manifested into many different forms, but all leads to the same goal: to prevent Asian Americans from pursuing upward mobility which is the core of the American Dream. This set the stage, politically and socially, for Asian American immigrant life. To explain how this chronology works, the first political cartoon illustrates how Asian immigrants are enticed by the idea of the American dream in their vulnerability. As the rest of the other media objects show, however, it is not possible to achieve due to the underlying racism and white superiority complex in the United States. This sets the scene for the clip from the movie Minari, which shows an Asian family immigrating to the United States during the 1980s in pursuit of the American dream. The husband’s assimilation and loss of his cultural identity creates havoc amongst the family, as he tries to avoid discrimination at all costs while also trying to achieve upward mobility. This ubiquitous discrimination and racism trudges along throughout history, as this has affected modern figures such as Jeremy Lin. He struggles trying to be successful in a world and field where he is underrepresented. His struggles for success aligns with the Harvard lawsuit protest poster, where Harvard admissions was accused of discriminating against Asian Americans for racist, stereotypical reasons. The other political cartoon highlights the specific Asian prejudice during the Trump era and the Coronavirus pandemic. This set the stage, politically and socially, as the utmost important political figure in the United States publicly shames Asian Americans.

The Chronology of the Media Objects

Final Thoughts

After the review of sources through a historical, theoretical, and artistic lens, it is completely evident that the American dream is a fabled myth for Asian American immigrants. From the deeply rooted racism and xenophobic nature stamped in the culture of the United States, as well as how Asian ideals do not align with American ideals, this “dream” is perpetuated by false hope. It is utterly misleading towards immigrants seeking a better life. America does not embrace its melting pot culture, but perhaps is intolerant of it.

Dream it

Work for it

Fail it

Dream it • Work for it • Fail it •

Notes

  1. Ahn, A. (Director). (2016). Spa Night [film]. Nonetheless Productions. Strand Releasing. 

  2. . Le, D. et al. (2020). Are You Threatening Me? Asian-American Panethnicity in the Trump Era. Social Science Quarterly.  

  3. Ibid.

  4. Paik, A. et. al. (2020). “Sanctuary.” Bans, Walls, Raids, Sanctuary: Understanding U.S. Immigration for the Twenty-Fairst Century. University of California Press. 

  5. Ibid.

  6. Ibid.

  7. Kim, C. (2019). Playing the Racial Trump Card: Asian Americans in Contemporary U.S. Politics. Amerasia Journal. 

  8. Ibid.

  9. Cohen-Marks, M. et. al. (2011). Can the American Dream Survive the New Multiethnic America? Evidence from Los Angeles. Sociological Forum. 

  10. Ibid

  11. Wang, M. et al. (2022). “Why Should I Not Speak My Own Language (Chinese) in Public in America?”: Linguistic Racism, Symbolic Violence, and Resistance. TESOL Quarterly. 

  12. Ibid. 

  13. Kim, C. (2019). Playing the Racial Trump Card: Asian Americans in Contemporary U.S. Politics. Amerasia Journal. 

  14. Wyatt-Nichol, H. (2011). The Enduring Myth of the American Dream: Mobility, Marginalization, and Hope. International Journal of Organizational Theory and Behavior.

  15. Ibid. 

  16. Soergel, Andrew. “Most of America's Businesses Run by White Men - US News & World Report.” U.S. News: Economy, U.S. News, 16 Sept. 2016, https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-01/most-of-americas-businesses-run-by-white-men-says-census-bureau. 

  17. Patraporn, R. (2021). Wealth Inequality Among Asian Americans: The Continuing Significance of  Ethnicity and Immigration. Asian American Policy Review. 

  18. Ibid.

  19. Nir, S. (2015). “The Price of Nice Nails.” The New York Times, The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/10/nyregion/at-nail-salons-in-nyc-manicurists-are-undepaid-and-unprotected.html. 

  20. Ibid.

  21. Ibid.

  22. Jie, L. (2015). “What is Freedom?” China Daily. Political Cartoon.  https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/images/attachement/jpg/site1/20100806/0013729e45180dc59a6f30.jpg. 

  23. Ibid.

  24. Chung, I. (Director). (2021). Minari [film]. A24. Plan B Entertainment.

  25. Ibid.

  26. Leong, E. (Director). (2013). Linsanity [film]. Ketchup Productions. Arowana Films. 

  27. Ibid.

  28. Voa News. (2013). Harvard No More Racial Stereotyping. Photograph. Cambridge, MA. 2E2E9111-674C-40CA-B0D5-7EF0605ACB76_cx0_cy10_cw0_w408_r1_s.jpg

  29. Ibid.

  30. Ibid.

  31. Williams, J. (2021). “Trump, COVID-19, and Asian Americans.” CDN. Political Cartoon.

  32. Ibid.